Hull:
The Armor of Ships
Technically and
economically, hulls are a paramount design consideration in shipbuilding. Hulls
determine a ship’s structural integrity, safety, and stability while contributing
about 20%
of the ship’s total cost. Remember, ships transport over 90%
of globally traded cargo through 90,000
cargo ships.
Erika Tanker Failed in 1999 due to a Weakened
Structure
With corrosion, fatigue
cracks are the main cause for failure of ships, railway tank-cars, and road
tankers. Fatigue cracks can grow in a branched or curved manner different from
the shape in which they are formed. Repairs are not always viable in view of exorbitant
maintenance expenses.
Operating
Conditions & Stresses
Ships face the onslaught
of waves, wind, cargo loading-unloading, engine thrust and vibrations, and
irregular seaways. Hull loads are first transferred from panels to stiffeners,
then to primary members viz. longitudinal girders and transverse rings, and
finally to shell plates.
1
2
Hull
Structure
(Source:
Joints between
longitudinal stiffeners/girders and transverse web frames are particularly prone
to fatigue failure due to high stress levels. And it is precisely these areas
that are critical for the ship’s total strength.
Double hulled ships with
larger cargo capacities have more joints making them more vulnerable to fatigue
cracks. Corrosive marine environment further reduces the fatigue life of hull
members.
Ship structures are
designed to behave elastically during their design life of about 20 years. Three
primary design requirements for hulls are high reliability, good performance,
and easy maintenance. Ships can fail due to:
· Yielding by excessive tensile
loads
· Buckling by excessive
compressive loads
· Fatigue by small loads applied
repeatedly
Fatigue cracks can cause:
· structural
failure of the entire ship
· cargo
and ballast leakage
· flooding
or water intrusion
· hull
degradation
Predicting the growth of
fatigue cracks requires precise knowledge of the sea environment the ship will
face. Data on wave measurements is available from satellites and buoys.
However, fatigue cracks
occur earlier than expected due to uncertainty in forecasting sea conditions.
This happens because:
· Lack of Data: ship
classification societies provide stress-range-distribution data for fatigue
assessment that is not applicable for larger ships and innovative hulls that
are presently in fashion
· Limitations of Assumptions: the
actual sea conditions may be different from the conventionally assumed ones
· Redistribution of Residual Stresses: residual
stresses persist even after the original cause for the stress is removed.
Such original stress causers include heat gradients, machining operations,
welding, deformation, corrosion etc.
Hogging & Sagging
Waves are the primary
cause of fatigue failure in ships. Fatigue crack inducing loads on ships are:
· Longitudinal Strength Loads affect
the ship’s longitudinal members. These include shear force, longitudinal
bending movement, and torsional moment and can be:
Ø Static Longitudinal Loads due to
local load asymmetries in stationary water
Ø Dynamic Longitudinal Loads are
induced by waves. These include the hogging and the sagging bending movement,
shear force, and dynamic torsional moment
· Transverse Strength Loads
distort the transverse members of the ship and include:
Ø Weight of the Ship Structure, Cargo, and
Ballast Water
Ø Hydrostatic and Hydrodynamic Loads
induced respectively by the static pressure of the surrounding water and by the
waves
Ø Inertia of the Cargo and Ballast Water exerts
stresses when the ship changes direction or speed along any of its three axes
Ø Impact Loads of Slamming and Sloshing.
Slamming is the severe impact of ships on the water surface. Sloshing is the
impact of the free surface of the oil in the tank when the oil resonates with ship
movement
· Local Strength Loads affect
local structural members such as stiffeners, shell panels, and stiffener
connectors
Design-Level Safeguards
Currently, ships that
resist fatigue completely may be technically feasible but economically
unviable. Fatigue cracks are therefore inevitable. The following design
techniques can however minimize fatigue cracks:
· Better Load Calculation Techniques such
as the long-term prediction method
that forecasts a ship’s response to irregular waves over 20 years. Such methods
are more practical and convenient than conventional methods
Fatigue Crack Prone Areas
· Better Design Techniques such as
replacing
the conventional slot structures that use a fatigue-crack-prone bracket to
connect longitudinal stiffeners with transverse web members. Such connection
transfers load from the side shell to the transverse members
· Incorporating Whipping Stresses in Load
Calculations for whipping stresses have multiplied in recent
times with increase in the flare, the outward
angle between the vertical and the ship’s hull plate at the bow and stern
Designers do not usually
consider the whipping
stress caused by vibrations due to collisions between the hull and the
waves
Post a Comment